WASHINGTON — House Democrats are deeply divided over a vote to end U.S. aid for Israel — an intraparty fight, which has now split the party’s top two leaders.
Subscribe to read this story ad-free
Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.
The rare public disagreement at the party’s highest levels highlights deep turmoil among lawmakers and the party base about how to handle U.S. relations with Israel. It pits a rising progressive wing calling for cutting off assistance to Israel, at least until the Netanyahu government changes its approach to Gaza, against center-left Democrats who are deeply reluctant to upend the U.S.’s decades-long alliance with Israel.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., indicated that he will vote against an amendment by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., that would cut off aid to Israel, calling the measure “overly broad.”
House Minority Whip Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, the No. 2 Democrat, broke with Jeffries, saying hours before the Wednesday afternoon vote that she will support it.
Despite her reservations, Clark said Wednesday, “It is clear that the status quo is not tenable,” and added: “We should not provide a blank check for military aid to any country that does not comply with U.S. law, interests, and values.”
“The Netanyahu government has failed to meet that standard. I will be voting yes, not because I agree with the entirety of the amendment, or the GOP’s cynical motivations for its consideration, but because I believe we must change course,” Clark said in a statement. “While Democratic Members will make different decisions on this amendment in good faith, we are absolutely united in our shared goal of permanent peace.”
The legislation by Massie, a vocal non-interventionist and fiscal conservative, would bar any funding in the national security and State Department appropriations bill from being used for Israel. It would also block $3.3 billion in U.S. security assistance for Israel.
In a letter to colleagues Tuesday, Jeffries wrote that the Massie amendment “would restrict our country’s ability to confront Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations in the region who are sworn enemies of both the United States and Israel.”
He added that “there are more decisive ways to achieve the urgent change necessary when it comes to the far-right Netanyahu government.”
The No. 3 House Democrat, Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar of California, is sticking with Jeffries and voting no.
The amendment is not expected to pass, but it will put lawmakers on record on the issue after Israel joined the Trump administration in beginning a war with Iran and as its unpopular war in Gaza approaches the three-year mark in October. At least two dozen people were killed in Israeli airstrikes in Gaza in the last two days, the Associated Press reported, despite a cease-fire.
Some Democrats said they were wrestling with whether to vote for the amendment all the way up to the vote.
Rep. Ami Bera, D-Calif., who serves on the Foreign Affairs and Intelligence committees, said he would vote “present” because he supports the U.S-Israel relationship but does not “condone the Netanyahu government’s conduct of the war in Gaza and the resulting humanitarian crisis, its actions in Lebanon, its failure to confront escalating settler violence in the West Bank, and its role in drawing the United States into the current war with Iran.”
According to a Gallup tracking poll, U.S. public opinion on the longstanding Middle East conflict is shifting. In 2026, Americans said for the first time that they were more sympathetic to Palestinians (41%) than Israelis (36%).
The figure was more lopsided among Democrats; 65% said they’re more sympathetic to Palestinians, while 17% said they’re more sympathetic to Israelis.
As a result, House Democratic leaders have been facing pressure from progressives in the caucus to take a more aggressive stand against Israel.
One day before the vote, Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar, D-Texas, circulated a letter to colleagues that championed a “yes” vote on the Massie amendment, arguing: “The Democratic Party needs a new approach to Israel and Palestine.”
“The American people are crying out for an end to US tax dollars subsidizing Israel’s military,” Casar wrote in his letter. “At a time when millions are struggling to make ends meet, we are sending billions of dollars to a military that has killed tens of thousands of civilians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Lebanon, destabilized the region, and helped lead us into war with Iran.”
In a statement, Casar said he would vote for the Massie amendment, though he wished it were more narrowly tailored to target military funding rather than all funds.
Casar has accused Israel of waging “war crimes” in Gaza.